Project

Profile

Help

Bug #2055 ยป Bug #11572 - 2018-05-08T13_22_25Z.eml

Frank Arensmeier, 2018-05-08 15:22

 
Return-Path: <frank@paligo.se>
Received: from m.launchco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by m.launchco.com (Dovecot) with LMTP id G0BwEA+j8Vo6KgAAa1G0NA for <dropbox@plan.io>; Tue, 08 May 2018 15:22:18 +0200
Received: from mail-lf0-f44.google.com (mail-lf0-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by m.launchco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DDED25893 for <inbox+saxonica+f38e+saxon-c@plan.io>; Tue, 08 May 2018 15:22:17 +0200
Received: by mail-lf0-f44.google.com with SMTP id r2-v6so9698842lff.4 for <inbox+saxonica+f38e+saxon-c@plan.io>; Tue, 08 May 2018 06:22:17 -0700
Received: from [10.0.1.23] (78-72-111-202-no185.tbcn.telia.com. [78.72.111.202]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j17-v6sm5419773lfb.40.2018.05.08.06.22.15 for <inbox+saxonica+f38e+saxon-c@plan.io> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 08 May 2018 06:22:15 -0700
Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 15:22:07 +0200
From: Frank Arensmeier <frank@paligo.se>
To: inbox+saxonica+f38e+saxon-c@plan.io
Message-ID: <42444395-FE31-4BE7-B9B8-6C4D9F92AF58@paligo.se>
Subject: [Bug #2055] Apache allocates a lot of memory without releasing it
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-He-Spam-Score: -1.9
Delivered-To: <dropbox@plan.io>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on m.launchco.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_DKIMWL_WL_MED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
version=3.4.0
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at
http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.215.44 listed in list.dnswl.org] *
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.1
DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1
DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * -0.0
T_DKIMWL_WL_MED DKIMwl.org - Whitelisted Medium sender
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
Envelope-to: inbox+saxonica+f38e+saxon-c@plan.io
Authentication-Results: m.launchco.com; dmarc=none header.from=paligo.se
Authentication-Results: m.launchco.com; dkim=pass reason="2048-bit key;
unprotected key" header.d=paligo-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com
header.i=@paligo-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b=M7YvRllz; dkim-adsp=none
(unprotected policy); dkim-atps=neutral
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=paligo-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :to;
bh=Zx40P2BkaMzJVCTOU6KRbk99K0MAGkt1FDxm2rYgqig=;
b=M7YvRllz/RTNxakGaVS9q4bgyh2FMUFVJfz+FuWLD+lIdZLMxOtJHx2o4VwG3/AQqC
oBJB5fyZrJy/YojulYFTq5mNiaVn2yg0dhyTs9e/+MDA93wfRbl4s/hJvX6YWKXHesOl
wQaLcq2CUW0xgFBlBzAkdu9MyN+NF0Fs1lCHDul4yONTz24xBSFqeujSn7dtQ1Qyx2iJ
jD9c375NEL6fOHEtnfN5j7BXCb3K23JvXt2mjjHPQq2Jynqd5Awa8q7jur81BR5lJ2wK
I5fmRtA49rDuQMTsomA03lwN1IIvaJ7DhNs5xUnOLza2LvTjRFqACR/XCw7OD4SUWm8J 3IEA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net;
s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version
:subject:message-id:date:to; bh=Zx40P2BkaMzJVCTOU6KRbk99K0MAGkt1FDxm2rYgqig=;
b=p9gWkFdgNINsU6KJO0mtwdJoykEgWm8w2sfwOVPvLosU02oZd1WRGy/wFRVA/sPfnJ
2F30v+z4msErFI9j4BivoIoVybCqpgZ5uYZjGv/S94dlkNEbqz4K3EflTNqnh5u+rHzp
WZRyXAekqSS5gnWrJ+D5onPyBKv0JWoJA6gEeanxyqgc5u7ScKWnL1A8tlvRXRhjwgYR
YfZDFzRHZkgA1J3Pu51nolD5a0cFZBXywU0IJHy0Ns5CjO6ddI7qOFX21i6iqAX+ESDi
c2hWBu+xbJX+FyxLAR+Nvy3EklF8SxDoFqw+jb6d0oSpD4ngUnqBok2OE6L+DFRvywGv j1rg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwc2oQLZ2Gb5CxSnO+/jJKZoeF3oEmf6f2WyM7giEp2UAhP9xirk
2TxGgFQyQczUZDu4v4QK/T8EbWI5ITY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZo1UMsXGiN621iS+pVIzzTrBsm/bQYALCXeM1+GFT6QVgJqa4eeyGjhm+9oi5CZk+yev4Zg0A==
X-Received: by 2002:a19:10e1:: with SMTP id
94-v6mr5624816lfq.145.1525785736573; Tue, 08 May 2018 06:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)

Hi!

I know that this bug has been marked as fixed. However, I am experiencing=
a very similar behaviour with a fresh install. My setup: Ubuntu LTS 16, =
Apache 2.4, PHP 7.0.30 (tested with PHP 7.1.17) and latest Saxon-HE/C 64b=
it. Observed behaviour is that Apache spawns a couple of child processes =
as soon as Saxon is invoked. Problem is that those child processes are no=
t killed when PHP is done.

Any help greatly appreciated.
/frank=
    (1-1/1)