Project

Profile

Help

Forums » Open Discussion »

XSLT Macros

Added by Anonymous almost 18 years ago

Legacy ID: #3747365 Legacy Poster: Igor (igorotov)

Before delving into the XSLT2.0 specification I was hoping to see some form macro definition added to the specification. Even though Named Templates and functions are supported it would be nice to be able to create new instruction elements in XSLT. So instead of invoking the rather verbose <xsl:call-template name="doSomething"> <xsl:with-param name="arg1">1</xsl:with-param> <xsl:with-param name="arg2">2</xsl:with-param> </xsl:call-template> It would be nice to define a macro that could be invoked as an XSLT instruction, for instance: <ns:doSomething arg1="1" arg2="2"/> Or go even further and define macros that accepts nested macros, etc. (see FreeMarker for some ideas) Any ideas as to how such a generic macro could be built on top of Saxon as XSLT2.0 does not seem to support it?


Replies (3)

Please register to reply

RE: XSLT Macros - Added by Anonymous almost 18 years ago

Legacy ID: #3747927 Legacy Poster: Michael Kay (mhkay)

I was thinking of doing this a while ago before we had stylesheet functions. It would be nice in some ways, but it's not clear to me that there's room for yet another mechanism alongside templates and functions, especially if it's not part of the language spec. On the other hand, xsl:function came originally from saxon:function, which was provided as a way of writing extension functions in XSLT, and one could argue that there's just as good a case for being able to write extension instructions in XSLT.

RE: XSLT Macros - Added by Anonymous almost 18 years ago

Legacy ID: #3749263 Legacy Poster: Igor (igorotov)

Is this even possible to be implemented as a generic extension instruction in Saxon? I dont have much experience with writing extension elements, but I would be willing to give it a shot and possibly even contribute that back to Saxon, if there is an interest.

RE: XSLT Macros - Added by Anonymous almost 18 years ago

Legacy ID: #3749609 Legacy Poster: Michael Kay (mhkay)

If you're interested in doing this, I would think the most promising route is a preprocessor, which translates the "macros" (extension instructions) into named template calls. I think you could write this in XSLT.

    (1-3/3)

    Please register to reply