Bug #2160
closedAttempting to set more local variables (3) than the stackframe can accommodate (1)
100%
Description
Bug reported by Vladimir Nestorovsky here:
Updated by Vladimir Nesterovsky about 10 years ago
This reproduces the problem:
<xsl:stylesheet version="2.0"
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:t="this">
<xsl:template match="/">
<xsl:variable name="s" as="element()*">
<h>
<f/>
</h>
</xsl:variable>
<xsl:apply-templates mode="t:a" select="$s"/>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template mode="t:a" match="h">
<xsl:sequence select="f/t:f2(@a, @b, @c)"/>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template mode="t:a" priority="2" match="h">
<xsl:choose>
<xsl:when test="t:f1(*) = 'b'">
<s/>
</xsl:when>
<xsl:otherwise>
<xsl:next-match/>
</xsl:otherwise>
</xsl:choose>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:function name="t:f1" as="item()*">
<xsl:param name="e" as="element()?"/>
<xsl:sequence select="'d'"/>
</xsl:function>
<xsl:function name="t:f2" as="item()*">
<xsl:param name="a" as="xs:string?"/>
<xsl:param name="b" as="xs:string?"/>
<xsl:param name="c" as="xs:string?"/>
<xsl:sequence select="'d'"/>
</xsl:function>
</xsl:stylesheet>
With some modifications like this:
<xsl:stylesheet version="2.0"
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:t="this">
<xsl:template match="/">
<xsl:variable name="s" as="element()*">
<h>
<f/>
</h>
</xsl:variable>
<xsl:apply-templates mode="t:a" select="$s"/>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template mode="t:a" match="h">
<xsl:sequence select="f/t:f2(@a, @b, @c)"/>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template mode="t:a" priority="2" match="h">
<xsl:next-match/>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:function name="t:f1" as="item()*">
<xsl:param name="e" as="element()?"/>
<xsl:sequence select="'d'"/>
</xsl:function>
<xsl:function name="t:f2" as="item()*">
<xsl:param name="a" as="xs:string?"/>
<xsl:param name="b" as="xs:string?"/>
<xsl:param name="c" as="xs:string?"/>
<xsl:sequence select="'d'"/>
</xsl:function>
</xsl:stylesheet>
I get different error:
[java] Caused by: java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index: 0, Size: 0
[java] at java.util.ArrayList.rangeCheck(ArrayList.java:635)
[java] at java.util.ArrayList.get(ArrayList.java:411)
[java] at net.sf.saxon.expr.XPathContextMajor.getTargetComponent(XPathContextMajor.java:778)
[java] at net.sf.saxon.expr.XPathContextMinor.getTargetComponent(XPathContextMinor.java:554)
[java] at net.sf.saxon.expr.UserFunctionCall.callFunction(UserFunctionCall.java:507)
[java] at net.sf.saxon.expr.UserFunctionCall.iterate(UserFunctionCall.java:473)
[java] at net.sf.saxon.expr.SlashExpression.map(SlashExpression.java:852)
[java] at net.sf.saxon.expr.ContextMappingIterator.next(ContextMappingIterator.java:61)
[java] at net.sf.saxon.tree.iter.HomogeneityCheckerIterator.next(HomogeneityCheckerIterator.java:65)
[java] at net.sf.saxon.expr.Expression.process(Expression.java:555)
[java] at net.sf.saxon.expr.instruct.Template.applyLeavingTail(Template.java:338)
[java] ... 8 more
Updated by Michael Kay about 10 years ago
- Category set to Internals
Thanks. Reproduced the problem (with your first example). Occurs with Saxon-HE only. It's a failure in component binding: the call on f2(@a, @b. @c) is attempting to call f1 and is failing because f1's stackframe doesn't have room for the three arguments. I think that the problem is with the next-match; the current component in the dynamic context is wrong, so the wrong binding vector is being used.
Updated by Michael Kay about 10 years ago
Sorry for the delay on this, caused by the need to use a diagnostic build with HE-only code.
Now resolved; the problem occurs with a tail-call on xsl:next-match because it is not saving the "current component" correctly; the current component is needed for the new dynamic binding mechanism in 9.6 to work. This has been introduced to support calls across separately compiled packages.
The reason the failure doesn't occur on Saxon-EE is that the function calls are all inlined, so no dynamic binding occurs. (Function inlining is possible because the functions are implicitly private to the package, so they cannot be overridden from a different package. This should also mean that the calls can be statically bound even when not inlined. This little optimization has not been implemented in 9.6.
I've committed a patch (9.6 and 9.7 branches) and before marking as resolved I will now look at the "different error" that occurs with the modified stylesheet.
Updated by Michael Kay about 10 years ago
- Status changed from New to Resolved
I have confirmed that the "different error" is in fact a different symptom of the same problem; it is solved by the same patch. Therefore closing as resolved. We hope that a maintenance release including the patch will be out shortly.!!
Updated by O'Neil Delpratt about 10 years ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Closed
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
- Fixed in version set to 9.6.0.2
Bug fix applied to the maintenance release Saxon 9.6.0.2
Updated by O'Neil Delpratt about 9 years ago
- Sprint/Milestone set to 9.6.0.2
- Applies to branch 9.6 added
- Fix Committed on Branch 9.6 added
- Fixed in Maintenance Release 9.6.0.2 added
Please register to edit this issue