O'Neil Delpratt
- Login: ond1
- Email: oneil@saxonica.com
- Registered on: 2012-01-26
- Last connection: 2025-01-24
Issues
open | closed | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
Assigned issues | 22 | 696 | 718 |
Reported issues | 20 | 430 | 450 |
Projects
Project | Roles | Registered on |
---|---|---|
Saxon | Manager, Developer, Reporter | 2012-01-27 |
Saxon-CE | Developer, Reporter | 2012-02-01 |
SaxonC | Manager, Developer, Reporter | 2013-11-28 |
SaxonJS | Manager, Developer, Reporter | 2016-08-11 |
SaxonMirrorHE | Manager, Developer | 2021-02-02 |
Activity
Today
-
With some help from valgrind options. The stack trace where things are going wrong in findJavaTZ_md is below:
```
==4403== 14 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 6
==4403== at 0x4848899: malloc (in /usr/libe... Saxon/C Help and Discussions: RE: Possible memory leaksHi,
We're experiencing memory leaks with our application when using SaxonC 12.5.0.
I believe the attached program demonstrates some of those leaks.
When running the attached program with valgrind, valgrind reports 17 bytes definitel... -
> Hi O'Neil.
>
> One question regarding the loss from the graalvm isolate. Does that loss occur each time a new SaxonProcessor is created? Such that we would want to make our SaxonProcessor a single... -
First the 288 bytes I am seeing that are possibly lost are to do with the graalvm isolate:
```
==3224== 288 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly los... -
-
This looks like a duplicate of the discussion here: https://saxonica.plan.io/boards/4/topics/9525
2025-01-24
-
I think the 14 bytes on my code base is lost where we create the. `XsltExecutable`:
``` cpp
xslt = xsltProcessor->compileFromString(styleSheet);
```
Still not sure why, but narrowing it down.
Saxon/C Help and Discussions: RE: Possible memory leaksHi,
We're experiencing memory leaks with our application when using SaxonC 12.5.0.
I believe the attached program demonstrates some of those leaks.
When running the attached program with valgrind, valgrind reports 17 bytes definitel... -
```
==567279== LEAK SUMMARY:
==567279== definitely lost: 14 bytes in 1 blocks
==567279== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==567279== possibly... -
I have updated the java code to pick up the serialization properties in the SchemaValidator when we call setOutputFile. Bug #6589 (Resolved): Clarify in the documentation where to find serialization parametersFollowing the resolution of bug #6588 it would be good to make the clear in the documentation where the user can find the list of serialization parameters they can use.
-
Bug fixed in the SchemaValidator class. Bug #6668 (Resolved): SchemaValidator.setOutputFile() does not get appliedThe method `SchemaValidator.setOutputFile()` does not get applied when the `validate` method is called.
The workaround is to set the output file via the setProperty method:
``` cpp
val->setProperty("o", "filename.xml");
```
-
The workaround is to set the output file via the setProperty method:
``` cpp
val->setProperty("o", "filename.xml");
```
Also available in: Atom