Bug #2344
closed
Expression 'position() eq last()' wrongly evaluated inside an xsl:result-document instruction
100%
Description
When an expression 'position() eq last()' (or similarly 'position() ne last()') is used inside the body of an xsl:result-document instruction (for example as the select attribute of an xsl:value-of), but the context for these functions is outside the instruction, the wrong results are produced.
Bug found when running the 9.7 development branch, but also appears to be a bug in 9.5 and 9.6.
Updated by Debbie Lockett about 9 years ago
- Status changed from New to In Progress
- Assignee set to Debbie Lockett
Fix: implemented hasNext() method on ManualIterator (the method previously always returned false). So that the IsLastExpression evaluates correctly in the case that the current iterator is a ManualIterator (for instance when processing an xsl:result-document instruction).
Patch applied on 9.5, 9.6, and development 9.7 branches.
Test to be added to the XSLT 3.0 test suite.
Updated by O'Neil Delpratt about 9 years ago
- % Done changed from 0 to 80
- Fixed in version set to 9.5.1.10
Bug fix applied in the Saxon 9.5.1.10 maintenance release.
Bug issue to be left open until test case is added to test suite.
Updated by Michael Kay almost 9 years ago
- Category set to XSLT conformance
- Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
- Priority changed from Low to Normal
- Found in version changed from 9.7 to 9.6
Closing this now even though there's no regression test.
Updated by O'Neil Delpratt almost 9 years ago
- Status changed from Resolved to Closed
- % Done changed from 80 to 100
- Fixed in version changed from 9.5.1.10 to 9.6.0.6
Bug fix applied in the Saxon 9.6.0.6 maintenance release.
Updated by Debbie Lockett almost 9 years ago
XSLT 3.0 test insn/result-document-1301 was added 2015-05-06.
Updated by O'Neil Delpratt over 8 years ago
- Sprint/Milestone set to 9.6.0.6
- Applies to branch 9.6 added
- Fix Committed on Branch 9.6 added
- Fixed in Maintenance Release 9.6.0.6 added
Please register to edit this issue
.