Support #3540
closed
Bug XPath format-number function
Fix Committed on Branch:
9.8
Fixed in Maintenance Release:
Description
Good morning.
I'm using the version 9.8.0.4 library.
<xsl:decimal-format name="formatNumber" decimal-separator="," grouping-separator=" "/>
<xsl:value-of select="format-number(55, '### ###,##', 'formatNumber')"/>
Return '55,0' value.
I think it should be '55'?
Thanks for the answer.
Note that the same happens when you use default decimal-format characters:
format-number(55, '###,###.##')
returns
"55.0"
At first sight, this is a consequence of the rule in 4.7.4:
If (after making the above adjustments) the minimum-integer-part-size and the minimum-fractional-part-size are both zero, then the minimum-fractional-part-size is set to 1 (one).
Basically, you either need a digit before the decimal point or a digit after it, and the spec has decided that if you don't ask for either, then you get one after the decimal point.
Thanks for the answer.
Prompt the best solution.
I need:
- format-number(123456.123, '### ###,##', 'formatNumber') return "123 456,12" It is perfectly
2)format-number(123456, '### ###,##', 'formatNumber') return "123 456,0" Problem, I would like to see "123 456"
If you pay attention
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms256225(v=vs.120).aspx
The following function call returns 5,351
format-number(5351,"#,###")
Thanks for the help
Thanks, I figured it out.
Solution
format-number(123456, '### ##0,##', 'formatNumber')
- Tracker changed from Bug to Support
- Status changed from New to Closed
Please register to edit this issue
Also available in: Atom
PDF